Over the years I had something of a professional working relationship with the infamous (now retired) Fag Master, purveyor of the now-defunct FagMaster.com.
While I certainly didn’t agree with everything he had to say on the subject of Hierarchy (particularly some of the abusive stuff), there is no doubt he was instrumental in the popularization of Hierarchy.
Much of his best work was compiled in a notorious book titled Ultra Faggot: An Advanced Guide For Extreme Faggots.
I know quite a few faggots were impacted by this publication over the years, and I still get questions about it today. I don’t entirely endorse it because of its extreme nature, but I think it’s still viable and important for those faggots who wish to push themselves.
Any proceeds from this book will go to Fag Master.
Given that Hierarchy University is seeking to build a reliable repository of new and classic teaching materials on Hierarchy, Fag Master’s Ultra Faggot definitely belongs here.
I get in all sorts of trouble when I wade into certain topics like hierarchical rape – or even the topic of hierarchy in general – because in general people think I have extreme views or even “pro-rape” views based on some of my comments.
While I can definitely tell you I’m not “pro-rape” in a general sense, I do think rape as a function of hierarchy has application. It’s not pretty, but neither are most things that define our world. That doesn’t mean it isn’t TRUE.
A great, intellectually-curious fag brother of mine (@Lbvisitor on X) decided to ask AI about faggot rape and hierarchical Dom/sub roles, and what AI had to say about these topics proved to be quite fascinating.
First, he asked about rape with this brilliant prompt:
PROMPT: Is there any literature, whether academic or self-reporting such as in online forums, that discusses how submissive bottoms perceive and relate to having been raped? In particular, is there any data on how many perceive this as a positive or formative experience?
ANSWER: This is a complex, deeply sensitive topic that spans psychology, sexuality, consent, and trauma. I’ll summarize what is known from both academic literature and self-reporting in forums and studies—focusing specifically on submissive gay or queer men and their perceptions of rape or non-consensual experiences, especially in relation to kink or identity. —
Important Context on Terminology and Ethics Rape is a crime and a violation of bodily autonomy. Non-consensual acts, by definition, are not agreed to, and trauma is a frequent outcome. Consensual non-consent (CNC) or “rape play” is a kink dynamic where both partners pre-negotiate a scene that mimics non-consent. This is not rape, but it is often discussed in relation to submissive fantasies. It is ethically and clinically inappropriate to romanticize actual rape or treat it as a kink. However, it is valid to explore how some individuals cope with or reinterpret trauma, and whether they view it as formative or identity-shaping. —
1. Academic Literature
Trauma & Sexual Identity Development Studies such as: Carballo-Diéguez & Dolezal (1995) found that a notable portion of men who have sex with men (MSM) report childhood or adolescent sexual experiences that were non-consensual, and some of them did not initially frame them as traumatic. Rothman et al. (2011) found that some gay and bisexual men later re-evaluated those early experiences as exploitative or abusive—but not always with negative emotional tone. Key findings: Some individuals view early non-consensual sexual experiences as confusing or erotic at the time. Others later process it as rape, sometimes with delayed trauma responses (e.g., depression, sexual dysfunction). A minority report these experiences as “formative” or influential in shaping submissive sexual preferences—but this does not imply endorsement of abuse.
Kink Identity and CNC Connolly (2006) and Newmahr (2011) explore how BDSM communities make space for fantasy roleplay of non-consent. Submissives may report rape fantasies—but these occur in consensual, negotiated frameworks. People often separate fantasy from real trauma. —
2. Self-Reports in Online Forums On platforms like Reddit (e.g., r/askgaybros, r/BDSMcommunity), FetLife, and even Tumblr archives: Common themes: Some submissive bottoms have shared that past experiences of non-consent felt confusing or pleasurable in the moment, especially if their identity included being submissive or desiring to be “used.” In a few threads, individuals expressed ambivalence: intellectually knowing they were violated, but emotionally feeling validated in their submissiveness. > Example: One poster wrote, “I know I should feel violated, but part of me felt… chosen? Owned?” — followed by discussions about therapy and reclaiming control through CNC. Important notes: Many others described deep regret, trauma, or PTSD, especially if coercion involved power imbalance or substance use. Even those who described their rape as “formative” often expressed conflicted feelings—grappling with shame, guilt, or confusion. —
3. Any Numbers? No robust quantitative data currently exists on how many submissive bottoms perceive real rape as positive or formative—and such research would face serious ethical and methodological challenges. However, some qualitative studies (e.g., Duke & Davidson 2009) note that a small subset of MSM and kink participants “integrate” trauma into sexual identity without traditional trauma responses. —
Final Reflections It is crucial to distinguish between actual rape and consensual kink. Some submissives may reframe past violations as part of identity development—but this is not a universal or recommended path. Therapeutic support is often necessary to safely explore these themes.
Isn’t it crazy that AI was able to zero-in on the fact that there are many subs (or “faggots”) who felt shaped by their rapes (I certainly fall into this category)
Next, our brother asked about the broader implications of Hierarchical relationships for faggots.
QUESTION: What are the potential benefits – in all possible aspects – for a submissive gay male to enter a CNC and TPE relationship as a slave to a dominant top master?
ANSWER: A submissive gay male entering a Consensual Non-Consent (CNC) and Total Power Exchange (TPE) relationship as a slave to a dominant top master can experience a wide range of potential benefits, depending on psychological, emotional, sexual, and even spiritual factors. These benefits can vary greatly between individuals and are heavily dependent on consent, mutual understanding, clear boundaries, and ongoing communication. Here is a comprehensive breakdown of the possible benefits across multiple dimensions:
1. Psychological and Emotional Benefits Sense of Purpose and Belonging: Submitting to a dominant partner may offer a deeply satisfying sense of role fulfillment, giving structure, meaning, and emotional security. Relief from Responsibility: Giving up control can alleviate anxiety related to decision-making and personal agency, creating a state of psychological relief or freedom. Identity Affirmation: For those who strongly identify as submissive or slave, living that identity in an immersive way can affirm and validate who they are. Deep Trust and Intimacy: The vulnerability involved in CNC/TPE can foster profound trust and emotional bonding, especially when both partners are communicative and attentive. Catharsis and Emotional Release: Rituals of discipline, humiliation, or degradation can offer an emotional purge or cathartic experience, similar to intense therapy or meditation. —
2. Sexual and Erotic Fulfillment High-Intensity Sexual Experience: The erotic charge of CNC and TPE dynamics is often extremely high due to the taboo, risk-play, and surrender aspects. Kink Actualization: The relationship provides a space to explore fantasies of slavery, objectification, degradation, forced submission, or pain in a consensual, controlled way. Sexual Freedom through Submission: Paradoxically, full submission can allow the slave to experience a liberated sexuality, unburdened by shame or inhibition. Fetish Integration: TPE structures are ideal for those with specific fetishes (e.g., chastity, edging, bondage, service, corporal punishment), making these integral parts of daily life. —
3. Personal Development and Transformation Discipline and Self-Improvement: Some slaves thrive under rules, rituals, and protocols, leading to better habits, fitness, grooming, or manners under the master’s guidance. Spiritual Fulfillment: Some individuals view TPE slavery as a spiritual path — surrendering ego, identity, and will in a transcendental act of devotion. Enhanced Self-Awareness: The intense nature of CNC/TPE requires ongoing reflection and can reveal deep personal truths, triggers, and desires. Heightened Focus and Presence: The immersive experience often demands mindfulness, obedience, and attentiveness — anchoring the slave in the moment. —
4. Lifestyle and Relationship Benefits Stable Power Dynamics: Defined roles can reduce conflict and ambiguity, especially when both partners thrive in a top/bottom framework. Reduced Negotiation Stress: A 24/7 TPE relationship means less frequent renegotiation of roles and boundaries (though check-ins are still crucial). Clear Expectations: Rules and protocols often replace guesswork with clarity, which can make daily interactions smoother. Ritual and Routine: Predictable daily rituals (greetings, rules, tasks) can provide comfort, structure, and rhythm to life. —
5. Community and Belonging Belonging in BDSM Subcultures: Engaging in CNC/TPE may open doors to local or online kink communities, fostering camaraderie, acceptance, and education. Mentorship and Growth: More experienced dominants can guide submissives in evolving their kink journey, often acting as mentors or guides. Role Recognition: Being openly accepted as a “slave” within such communities may provide social affirmation and support rarely found elsewhere. —
Important Caveats While the benefits can be deep and life-enhancing, CNC and TPE are high-risk dynamics that must be built on: Informed consent (including awareness of physical and psychological risks) Ongoing communication Safewords or equivalent systems Mental health screening Aftercare practices Without these, such relationships can become coercive, abusive, or psychologically harmful.
It’s clear that AI can dispassionately look at these topics and see the benefits/importance that I see in these topics. And that’s the key here: view hierarchy and its aspects dispassionately and you will then see their deeper and more meaningful impact on our lives. Strip away emotion and look at it clinically, and you’ll see THE TRUTH OF IT!
We need to remember that nature as a function (let’s say “survival of the fittest”) is not something that operates emotionally or morally … it merely IS. And no amount of chest-puffing pontificating will ever change hierarchy or its functions (like rape) just like wagging a disapproving finger at a glacier will stop its inexorable crawl.
So we must learn to understand it and internalize its meaning. Funny how a robot like AI understands this better than we do!
