Being Woke Without Being A Joke
If there has been one consistent aspect of this site and project, it’s been my ability to enrage and trigger readers with my sometimes-controversial views. I’ve even received death threats from readers over the years (particularly during my formative years on Tumblr)!
Of course, I don’t really care about upsetting people if I feel like I can demonstrate factual or experiential evidence to support my claims. Sadly, facts mean little to the trolls online. They search the online world looking for a fight or a reason to get offended. I imagine that’s an exhausting existence, but I’m up for the fight if they’re willing to bring it to me.
That said, I received a letter in my Questions From Readers inbox from a reader who was annoyed/offended/upset by an answer I gave to an owned faggot who had a female friend demanding that the faggot must leave his Master because she felt like the Master was raping him. You can read that original Q&A post by CLICKING HERE.
The letter has two parts, so I’m going to split it and tackle each part separately.
This is not a question, but a mere correction on your application of the term “woke.”
Uh oh.
“Your female friend is totally wrong. She’s looking at things from the woke female perspective that is currently destroying all engagement between males and females.”
Social media and the internet is not real life, sir (do not mistake respect for submission), nor do I believe it is indicative of how real life interactions tend to occur. This is the opinion of an individual who ingests online interaction to an unhealthy extent, so much so that their entire worldview has been molded by the experiences of others’ online, and not their very own exposures, experiences, and environment. The internet is (and has always been) a double-edged sword that has become increasingly more sharpened on the negative side and increasingly more dull on the polar opposite of said word due to extremist positions being both presented and perceived as normalcy (due to false anonymity and lack of an equal and opposite reaction) when it just is not the case. An easy way to gauge this is the amount of disrespect and hatred that is espoused today online that simply would not be espoused, nor fly, in actual life unless you are an individual that will accept and welcome both sacrifice and consequence despite their rhetoric, beliefs, or actions i.e., integrity (a characteristic the people in this world has always lacked but now has tremendously regressed).
As for your usage of the term “woke,” I admittedly find it humorous how history tends to repeat itself, sir. This is a term derived from the Black man (and woman) that reside within the United States and has always meant to be privy of the social, economical, and political injustices, exploitations, and degradation the Black man continues to face. However sir, your usage is more aligned with the White man’s, the White man’s profound and documented history of co-opting, hijacking, and perverting idioms that originates within the Black masses and turns their colloquialisms from phrases that are primarily meant to uplift, enlighten, and establish brotherhood — into expressions delegated to denigrate, insult, and shame. This is a gross and outright disrespectful perversion the Black man knows all too well, especially within the States; does “Black fatigue” ring a bell? This is nothing new sir, this is history repeating itself over and over and over again. I suggest you educate yourself further, sir, we all can — and do — continue learning until our time has come to cease.
The first paragraph of this diatribe gets it wrong right off the bat. This anonymous writer says, “This is the opinion of an individual who ingests online interaction to an unhealthy extent, so much so that their entire worldview has been molded by the experiences of others’ online, and not their very own exposures, experiences, and environment” without knowing anything about me and my personal life. You must understand that I have a wide group of close friendships (some of them many decades long), and I have a job in SALES which puts me in constant contact with people of all walks of life. So yeah, I’m not spending all of my life online.
As an English major, I definitely understand the importance of etymology and classical origins of words. I also understand (particularly with English) how words mutate as societal composition changes. For example, Merriam-Webster’s 2025 “Word of the Year” is “slop”, which has apparently gained a new definition in the age of AI. Word usage changes, and it doesn’t always carryover previous definitions when it does.
Sure, the word “woke” has its origins from another time, but I was using the current definition of the word the West has adopted, namely this: “Today, the term carries highly polarized meanings, used positively to signify progressive awareness and activism, but often used pejoratively by critics to dismiss progressive or left-wing ideas as excessive or performative.”
Women have largely become “woke” and hypersensitive to any actions or statements they find violates their personal space/values. I’ve seen Men jailed on false charges simply because a woman was pissed off. I’ve seen Men fired for accidentally brushing up against a woman.
Alec Baldwin mentioned this horrific new atmosphere in an episode of Comedians In Cars Getting Coffee with Jerry Seinfeld:
So yeah, I pretty much stand by my point here.
And it goes on:
“Men are afraid to even touch a female because they start crying rape. It’s stupid.”
This is simply not reality, sir. I understand man-on-man sex gravitates towards and invites rougher, more primal, and less emotional sex (I prefer my sex that way as well) but your assertion of the implication that women do not want the romantic advancements of men is false, sir. Your claim that considers the affairs today have studies conducted upon them already, and they tend to show women both want men to approach them still and they have become increasingly more individual and career oriented. This, in turn, makes men that lack self confidence, have had bad experiences, or are consuming unhealthy, unrealistic, purposefully extremist rhetoric from “manosphere” grifts online both grow a disdain for women and begin to consider the alternative — a faggot — to satiate their sexually frustrated desires.
I’ve never suggested that women don’t want Men to approach them. However, as I elucidated above, women now have countless new social roadblocks and unnatural standards that make such approaches by Men either incomprehensible, annoying, or even dangerous.
Before I get more flak, here’s what I mean by “unnatural” – women are naturally supposed to be more submissive than Men. But in the new enlightenment (sarcasm) women want to pretend like they’re equal to Men, except whenever they want the benefits of being submissive. You’d have an easier time figuring that out by reading tea leaves. It’s insane how far off track women have gone over the last 20-30 years.
As you correctly point out, this is one reason why Alphas of all kinds seek out faggots, because faggots still offer them what they really need: worship and service. It’s such a simple thing, but the implications are tremendous.
Men and Alphas are simply not going to go without what they want, need, and deserve simply because females have abandoned their natural position in the pursuit of autonomy. These days I’ve seen more Men put in jail by vengeful women and weeping in jail over the loss of their children (and/or more women abandoning their children) than I ever imagined I would, and these new realities show just how far off society is from Natural Law.
I lay a vast majority of the blame for this societal collapse at the feet of “modern” females and their unnatural choices. They simply no longer appreciate the critical role they’re meant to play, preferring instead to indulge in selfish desires. That’s why faggots are going to win many of these contests, because we still do appreciate it.
So I don’t know where this leaves us. I suppose at an impasse. I’m not changing my mind.
