Questions From Readers
I’ve been a faggot before the new definition was made. I knew that I only wanted to serve Men, usually sexually until They were satisfied. I called myself an ultra-submissive. I never wanted to cum – my excitement was when the Man climaxed. It was pre-AIDS, and near a navy and Air Force bases, so the number of Men who needed and/or wanted my services were large – once when I counted was over 100 different Men in only four days.
I have been called all sorts of names – faggot, cocksucker, beta, cumguzzler. And I agreed with them all. Except one, which I am hearing more and more lately – LOSER. I can’t accept this term. I am not a loser. I was built for a special purpose, which I try to fulfill as often as I can. I dont stop when I hear that term, but afterwards, I really dont want to serve Him again. I dont understand why an Alpha needs to use that word when there are more alternative words. Am I being too sensitive?
BTW, I’m a 70 year old faggot, and started serving in the early 70s.
Brother, thank you for writing to me about this! It’s an important topic!
First of all, congratulations on finding and embracing your purpose as a young person without the benefit of both the internet and an accepting society. Today’s faggots cannot appreciate the obstacles you faced and overcame to achieve fulfillment. It simply wasn’t easy back then, and then the HIV crisis exponentially raised the difficulty level! I salute your achievement and perseverence!
I will correct you on one point: the word “faggot” was used as slang for sub males long before you were born. I’ve found the term used in books from the 1800s (see my video “What Is A Faggot” for evidence of this). Of course, we have been around practically since there were Men walking this planet, and there have been multiple words describing us besides “faggot”, but that term specifically has been used for at least more than 150 years.
Like you, I despise the term “loser” to describe faggots. I hear it mostly from straight Alphas in findom who are trying to break cashfags with humiliation. Of course, there are a lot of really dumb straight cashmasters in findom who have less sense and reasoning ability than the dumbest Labrador in the kennel.
The use of the term “loser” to describe a faggot reveals a fundamental lack of understanding of hierarchy. One of the fundamental principles of hierarchy is the fact that we are assigned our places within it at birth. It’s WHO WE ARE MEANT TO BE.
Faggots who overcome societal rejection and personal feelings and familial objections in order to serve and fulfill their hierarchical commission are definitionally NOT LOSERS. In fact, it makes them the direct opposite of a loser. It makes them inspirational examples of how to pursue true fulfillment regardless of the obstacles. For instance, I would NEVER call a “loser” any faggot from the Middle East who risks his life so he can serve Men and fulfill his purpose! Those faggots show more courage than these straight cashmasters will ever have!
But let’s extrapolate this even further so we can see how wrong it is to call a faggot a “loser”. Would these so-called “Alphas” call a Man crippled from birth a “loser” because he can’t walk?? Of course not! Or what about a Man born blind? Is he a “loser” too because he can’t see?
Like people born crippled or blind, we are born faggots. This is not a choice, just like being gay is not a choice. So faggots are not losers in any way.
It really hurts my heart that there are so many fags falling for that derogatory term because they have such low self-esteem. Part of the mission of this site and my efforts has been to raise awareness of this issue and help faggots to accept/embrace the mission that nature gave them. I guess I have a long way to go.
But brother, I agree completely with you, and I thank you for your powerful example of natural faghood fulfilled!
Have a question? CLICK HERE to ask!
